Anthro leg structure 3

Following from the previous post... now that I know to turn Google image enhance off so that it stops turning all my images black...

Unguligrade legs on the left and digitigrade on the right.

Another way to think about the tapering limb as it becomes more distal is to think about 'muscular bulk', 'taper' and 'tendon'. We have the main muscle bulk at the origin of the limb, the muscle tapers down towards the tendon and finally terminates as just tendon onto the bone. This can be applied to any individual muscle of a limb (fig. 2) or also to the limb as a whole (fig. 1). Drawing a limb with this in mind ensures it stays in proportion.

The proportions of the limb are indicated by the measuring arrows. The set of legs on the left have a shorter thigh in proportion to the more distal, (further from the body) part of the limb; this limb configuration would offer the character the ability to run faster. As I touched on this in a previous post, a longer distal portion of the limb offers a greater stride distance and holds more elastic strain energy, quickening the limbs movement. The legs of the digitigrade on the right have a proportion of thigh to lower leg almost 1:1, similar to us as plantigrades. This would offer more limb stability rather than speed with the joints being less prone to stresses or twisting.

One thing to note is that the stability and speed configurations can apply to both digitigrades and unguligrades; it would simply be species and character dependent.

Anthro leg structure 2

I was asked a few weeks ago to help with creating a set of satyr legs. The main point I outlined was:

only look at the biggest forms when filling out the wire frame with muscles. Keep the curves flowing; show the largest sweeps of these shapes to keep them dynamic; have them show the force of the muscles not just their outlines. Don’t get too hung up on individual muscles at the start, that detail is for later when you’re shading, make sure you’re drawing the big forms to start with.

Some ideas to consider on an unguiligrade biped leg.

Gesture: Centre top is an idea of the flowing curves for a digitigrade and unguligrade type. I wanted to get an idea of the fundamental shapes the curves make as if the legs were mechanical; they would be made of curves that would give them spring as they moved.

Form: On the left an idea of where the muscular bulk is as opposed to the bone and tendon areas. All limbs follow the principle that they get thinner the more distal (further from the torso) they become. Take the human arm as example, muscular bulk decreases further down the arm and the limb becomes more sinuous until we get down to just tendons controlling the hand and fingers. This decrease in muscular bulk is worth noting when drawing so as to keep the limb in proportion. On the right is this idea now shown as contours in the forms of the leg.

Function: At the bottom of the image is a movement sequence. Those areas shaded represent the major muscles that are contracting. The quadriceps, (Q) extend the knee just before the 'contact'. On the 'down', the limb is slowed by the hamstrings (H) as the limb takes the torso's full weight. The elastic energy in taking this weight is channelled down into to fetlock or toe joint by long flexor tendons. This energy is released in the 'up' with the gluteals (G) powering the knee to full extension and the hamstrings extending the hip. This drives the torso forwards as I've talked about in previous posts. Note that the 'knee' and the 'toe' joints flex and extend by the greatest degree, the 'ankle' joint is kept relativity stiff. If the ankle was allowed to flex too much the limb would collapse under the weight of the torso.



Anthro run cycle

... and now the wire frame for a possible run cycle. Here I've tried to oscillate both hips to reflect their full range of motion during this cycle. The timing isn't finely tuned yet, different moments of the cycle will create faster and slower points in each limbs movement which I haven't really maximised yet. Useful as a reminder that anthro movement is very energetic, likely the arms will have to be swung in arcs to maintain balance.

Ignore the black dots in the middle, they were placeholders for the start and finish of the cycle

Anthro walk cycle

A quick test of a wire frame I made of an anthro walk cycle. I think it's rather species neutral but I had a larger herbivore type in mind; not only is there rise and fall in the hips but due to the mass and stability issues of the legs, each step the leg is going to be thrown forward, creating a far amount of 'hip swagger'. This isn't efficient, as I've mentioned in previous posts, but a digitigrade or unguligrade on 2 legs isn't ever going to be.

Head shapes 2

The point of looking over skulls in the first place is to gain some idea of the forms that they lend to the shape of the head and face. One aspect of creature design a friend pointed out was using these observations to help make choices in accessory design. Again, somewhat dependent on the class of species and actually if you work the problem through you end up with some plausible if not odd looking results..

Any eye wear is going to need a much wider bridge. Glasses don't have to be designed to hook round the ears but if they did the arms would need to sit higher and not to the sides like for a human.

Head shapes

I better post some of the sketches I've been sitting on! I've been thinking about skull shapes for anthros for sometime. Previously I looked at the need for anthro skulls to have a cranial dimension like that of a human, if you're thinking intelligence it seems fitting to exaggerate an animals skull to hold a similar brain size to a humans.

The 2 small intermediate diagrams show the distinction of cranial size (red), 
nose/face area (blue) and jaw (green).

Animal skulls are much more elongated front to back than a human's. Where you'd draw an average human skull as a sphere with a box below for the jaw, for an anthro you're looking more at a ovoid with a box at the front. This is so you can retain the distinct facial features such as those elongated noses and jaws. You can break this idea down further into class (I take class to mean either carnivore, omnivore or herbivore). The main distinction between them being the required jaw size to tackle their specialised foods. As a general idea, jaws tend to get both longer and deeper with herbivores; more muscular action is needed to grind plant matter, so a large bone surface is required, their food is generally in a hard to reach place, hence the long face. For either class, starting with a skull similar to that of a human guarantees you'll retain an adequate brain size.

Taking this a little further the idea of snout length is certainly up to not only the species and the class but also to your own preference. Felines tend to have a much rounder short snout, canines have a more rectangular and thin snout. Length adaptation is up to you. For example, the sketches above are for carnivores, their main principle is that their jaws are thin and sleek with large forward pointing eyes however the length of the snout is undefined.

Jaws are nothing without teeth, and teeth are distinctly specialised for each class. There are a number of other more subtle differences than teeth to think about, especially if you want to be creating expressive characters. Jaw depth i've mentioned, however it's carnivores that tend to have a much larger jaw opening range to catch and eat pray. Useful for expressions showing rage and anger. Due to their large teeth, particularly their canines, carnivores have limited side to side motion which herbivore use to rotate their jaws to grind plant matter. Side to side motions are more or less reserved to show puzzlement or thinking. 

Ahhhhhh a splinter!

Huh?

Sorry, been busy!

Now that i'm home, time to get back into posting!