Don't just create, build

Where do you begin? Well you don't have to start with all this detail when designing a character but I wanted something specific for my Troganite horse. It's the parts that make the whole when designing anything, and the saying is true that you can't build on a bad foundation, so even if it's a drawing of a biological structure it starts with a well adapted frame.

Banners

The old anthroanatomica banner is now retired after 1 year of service. Let me know what you think of the new banner style and layout. Many thanks to you all for looking and adding to what is essentially a debate on plausible anatomy! :)

Tails

Something that's puzzled me for quite a while now is how does a tail work on a biped. Lets take for arguments sake that we are retaining this feature even in some vestigial form. The bones that form the caudal vertebrae of any tail are of course that tiny group of coccyx bones in a human. Far from being just a human vestigial tail, the coccyx is the site for attachment for many important pelvic floor muscles including the muscles of the genitals. How then, could we keep both the functionality of the pelvic floor needed in bipeds to help keep everything 'in' as well as functioning as a birth canal, and the aesthetics of an animal tail. Would caudal bones diverge from the sacrum, or could the sacrum be formed to function like that of the coccyx?

A few sketched ideas on how the pelvic floor could exist in a biped with a tail.

Anthro leg structure 3

Following from the previous post... now that I know to turn Google image enhance off so that it stops turning all my images black...

Unguligrade legs on the left and digitigrade on the right.

Another way to think about the tapering limb as it becomes more distal is to think about 'muscular bulk', 'taper' and 'tendon'. We have the main muscle bulk at the origin of the limb, the muscle tapers down towards the tendon and finally terminates as just tendon onto the bone. This can be applied to any individual muscle of a limb (fig. 2) or also to the limb as a whole (fig. 1). Drawing a limb with this in mind ensures it stays in proportion.

The proportions of the limb are indicated by the measuring arrows. The set of legs on the left have a shorter thigh in proportion to the more distal, (further from the body) part of the limb; this limb configuration would offer the character the ability to run faster. As I touched on this in a previous post, a longer distal portion of the limb offers a greater stride distance and holds more elastic strain energy, quickening the limbs movement. The legs of the digitigrade on the right have a proportion of thigh to lower leg almost 1:1, similar to us as plantigrades. This would offer more limb stability rather than speed with the joints being less prone to stresses or twisting.

One thing to note is that the stability and speed configurations can apply to both digitigrades and unguligrades; it would simply be species and character dependent.

Anthro leg structure 2

I was asked a few weeks ago to help with creating a set of satyr legs. The main point I outlined was:

only look at the biggest forms when filling out the wire frame with muscles. Keep the curves flowing; show the largest sweeps of these shapes to keep them dynamic; have them show the force of the muscles not just their outlines. Don’t get too hung up on individual muscles at the start, that detail is for later when you’re shading, make sure you’re drawing the big forms to start with.

Some ideas to consider on an unguiligrade biped leg.

Gesture: Centre top is an idea of the flowing curves for a digitigrade and unguligrade type. I wanted to get an idea of the fundamental shapes the curves make as if the legs were mechanical; they would be made of curves that would give them spring as they moved.

Form: On the left an idea of where the muscular bulk is as opposed to the bone and tendon areas. All limbs follow the principle that they get thinner the more distal (further from the torso) they become. Take the human arm as example, muscular bulk decreases further down the arm and the limb becomes more sinuous until we get down to just tendons controlling the hand and fingers. This decrease in muscular bulk is worth noting when drawing so as to keep the limb in proportion. On the right is this idea now shown as contours in the forms of the leg.

Function: At the bottom of the image is a movement sequence. Those areas shaded represent the major muscles that are contracting. The quadriceps, (Q) extend the knee just before the 'contact'. On the 'down', the limb is slowed by the hamstrings (H) as the limb takes the torso's full weight. The elastic energy in taking this weight is channelled down into to fetlock or toe joint by long flexor tendons. This energy is released in the 'up' with the gluteals (G) powering the knee to full extension and the hamstrings extending the hip. This drives the torso forwards as I've talked about in previous posts. Note that the 'knee' and the 'toe' joints flex and extend by the greatest degree, the 'ankle' joint is kept relativity stiff. If the ankle was allowed to flex too much the limb would collapse under the weight of the torso.



Anthro run cycle

... and now the wire frame for a possible run cycle. Here I've tried to oscillate both hips to reflect their full range of motion during this cycle. The timing isn't finely tuned yet, different moments of the cycle will create faster and slower points in each limbs movement which I haven't really maximised yet. Useful as a reminder that anthro movement is very energetic, likely the arms will have to be swung in arcs to maintain balance.

Ignore the black dots in the middle, they were placeholders for the start and finish of the cycle

Anthro walk cycle

A quick test of a wire frame I made of an anthro walk cycle. I think it's rather species neutral but I had a larger herbivore type in mind; not only is there rise and fall in the hips but due to the mass and stability issues of the legs, each step the leg is going to be thrown forward, creating a far amount of 'hip swagger'. This isn't efficient, as I've mentioned in previous posts, but a digitigrade or unguligrade on 2 legs isn't ever going to be.

Head shapes 2

The point of looking over skulls in the first place is to gain some idea of the forms that they lend to the shape of the head and face. One aspect of creature design a friend pointed out was using these observations to help make choices in accessory design. Again, somewhat dependent on the class of species and actually if you work the problem through you end up with some plausible if not odd looking results..

Any eye wear is going to need a much wider bridge. Glasses don't have to be designed to hook round the ears but if they did the arms would need to sit higher and not to the sides like for a human.

Head shapes

I better post some of the sketches I've been sitting on! I've been thinking about skull shapes for anthros for sometime. Previously I looked at the need for anthro skulls to have a cranial dimension like that of a human, if you're thinking intelligence it seems fitting to exaggerate an animals skull to hold a similar brain size to a humans.

The 2 small intermediate diagrams show the distinction of cranial size (red), 
nose/face area (blue) and jaw (green).

Animal skulls are much more elongated front to back than a human's. Where you'd draw an average human skull as a sphere with a box below for the jaw, for an anthro you're looking more at a ovoid with a box at the front. This is so you can retain the distinct facial features such as those elongated noses and jaws. You can break this idea down further into class (I take class to mean either carnivore, omnivore or herbivore). The main distinction between them being the required jaw size to tackle their specialised foods. As a general idea, jaws tend to get both longer and deeper with herbivores; more muscular action is needed to grind plant matter, so a large bone surface is required, their food is generally in a hard to reach place, hence the long face. For either class, starting with a skull similar to that of a human guarantees you'll retain an adequate brain size.

Taking this a little further the idea of snout length is certainly up to not only the species and the class but also to your own preference. Felines tend to have a much rounder short snout, canines have a more rectangular and thin snout. Length adaptation is up to you. For example, the sketches above are for carnivores, their main principle is that their jaws are thin and sleek with large forward pointing eyes however the length of the snout is undefined.

Jaws are nothing without teeth, and teeth are distinctly specialised for each class. There are a number of other more subtle differences than teeth to think about, especially if you want to be creating expressive characters. Jaw depth i've mentioned, however it's carnivores that tend to have a much larger jaw opening range to catch and eat pray. Useful for expressions showing rage and anger. Due to their large teeth, particularly their canines, carnivores have limited side to side motion which herbivore use to rotate their jaws to grind plant matter. Side to side motions are more or less reserved to show puzzlement or thinking. 

Ahhhhhh a splinter!

Huh?

Sorry, been busy!

Now that i'm home, time to get back into posting!

Lumbar Support

I've gone back to thinking more about spinal curves when it comes to anthros. This is particularly relevant with tough, heavy types and also very relevant when thinking about how a tail would be structured and function on a biped. I think that the fundamental understanding of what can and can't be done with anthros bipeds certainly concerns the lumbar support system.

Part of the lumbar lordosis support

The human S-curve transfers tension and load down into the pelvis via the sacro-iliac joint. If we are going to retain anthro features such as larger skulls, bigger chest and shoulder like that of Minotaurs, the more weight we are applying to the cervical and thoracic vertebrae, ultimately pulling the torso forward as well as the centre of gravity. This is going to make it harder for this S-curve to hold it's mid-line (shown in red). If the mid-line shifts away from the sacro-iliac joint then weight transmission is less efficient, resulting in muscle groups having to bear the torso's load rather than the spine. 


In humans an important deep structure called the thoracolumbar fascia, which are tough multi-directional connective tissues directly attached to the spinous processes of the lumbar vertebrae. Our erector spinae muscles and latissimus dorsi, as well as our core muscles such as the obliques act to pull the thoracic spine (our chest) backwards and downwards, keeping us held upright. The gluteals as I've mentioned in previous posts are under tone to hold the pelvis from tilting forward, keeping us stood upright. These multiple actions ultimately draw the lumbar spine into lordosis like drawing the string on a bow, the lumbar curve is under a great deal of elastic energy, stored in the thoracolumbar fascia.


Understanding the limits of the lumbar curve is important for anthro characters, who are often portrayed as extra massive, with craning necks and heads. The spinal curves may have to adjust to hold this weight and maintain the mid-line, either through hyperlordosis or even kyphosis.

How the sacro-iliac joint and the lumbar curve would be arranged to structure a tail is a relevant question. It would certainly require changes to the configuration of the pelvis as well as considerations on nerve pathways out of the sacrum.

More on the thoracolumbar fascia:

Stance sketches

Some ideas on digitigrade and ungiligrade legs this week. I'm hoping to have the time this month to complete some 2D animations on walking.

Anthro-grade stance

Been a few weeks from my last post, had a few things on my mind but it's given me time to sketch out more ideas, particularly on the subject of tails and anthro legs.

To keep the anthro 'stoop' we need to change some of the anatomy. Quadriceps shown in green, gluteals in shades of red, hamstrings in purple and the ilio-tibial tract in cream.

Anthro leg anatomy issues really come down to antho characters standing in a constant 'stoop'. I think that this is some sort of visual misnomer in that it's drawn to emulate the shape of an animals leg but with limited consideration on the extent of its impact to the anatomy. 

Holding a stooped position as a human is hard work, it requires a great deal of force from the quadriceps to keep the knee in partial flexion and the gluteals and hamstrings are under stress to hold the femur at an angle. This is because the weight of the torso is placing the centre of gravity too far behind the feet, the pelvis needs to tilt the torso forward to counterbalance this, bringing the centre of gravity back under the torso. That's why if you try squats in the gym, releasing the stress on your glutes can be done by leaning forward. This stoop is very energy inefficient, and clearly will lead to characters walking not only on bent knees but in a bent forward stance.

There could be a couple of ways to fix this if you wanted to keep the 'dog leg'. Either increase the muscular force the leg can muster (but this still does not change the energy required to hold the leg up, it just means the muscle will be slower to fatigue). Or you shorten the length of the femur. Shortening the distance of the load arm (shown above) makes the stance more energy efficient. This is because the load (the weight of the torso) is now much closer to the pivot (the knee joint), it means that less force is require to lift the load. Much like when using a wheel barrow, this is an example of a second class lever.

Shortening the thigh doesn't solve the problem but it certainly would help.

'A' represents a possible digitigrade stance with a vertical femur. 'B' represents a possible unguligrade stance where the femur is in a stoop. I was not trying to compare digitigrade and unguligrade here, only a vertical femur and one in a stoop.

Taking the stance as a whole it's easier to see that 'B', stood in a stoop with the torso fully upright, would result in the characters centre of gravity being behind it's foot, it's still below the torso but the torso is now more inclined to want to fall backwards because of the stoop, the quadriceps are taking the strain to hold this stance upright.

'A' is digitigrade and the femur is vertical but the knee is still slightly in flexion. If the quadriceps contract too much it will cause the trunk to fall forward. From a balance perspective the centre of gravity is better maintained under the feet of 'A' since the leg is much more vertical but it will of course require a greater level of tone to hold this stance than that of a human plantigrade biped. 

Combining the ideas above:

• shorter thigh
• thigh more vertical than stooped
• larger musculature to lower the fatigue 
• maintains a stance directly under the torso

Is this a more likely anatomically correct look for an antho? One of many configurations for sure!

Way is knowing the pelvic structure important?

It’s a good idea to note the configuration of the pelvis when creating any character, human or anthro. I'm a firm believer in sketching out the basic bone structure in any character sketch, it helps to create your anchor points and maintain your proportions. There are a number of landmarks of the hip that will dictate the overall look of your characters waist, hips and legs that are worth taking some time to study.

Landmarks from the front:
1. The iliac crest, the most obvious part of the pelvis you can feel under the skin. In an athletic character the crest forms the ridge to the bulging mass of the obliques, the muscles of your waist.
2. The inguinal ligament is formed by the obliques and demarcates the line where the torso ends and legs begin. It creates the distinctive 'V' or 'U' shape seen in the photo below.
3. Pubic tubercle this forward projection of the pubic bone can be felt under the public line and is the attachment of the inguinal ligament. The abdominal muscles also attach to the pubic bone. Below this landmark is the point at which the genitals sit, in the male for example via the suspensory ligament. (Also worth noting is that if your characters are in 'heroic' proportion, that's 8-heads high, this landmark marks the mid point of your character height).
4. The greater trochanter of the femur is the major attachment point of the gluteals. It is clearly visible in a frontal view as a bulge at the top of the leg and more predominant in the female. It adds a distinctive curve to the top of the leg when drawing characters from the front or back.

The distinctive 'V' or 'U' shape of the obliques.

Standing upright - Part III

In Part I I looked at changes in pelvic configuration from early hominids. It’s useful to note these changes as it helps explain why we are good at being bipedal and conversely, what wouldn't work or work very well. I’ve laid out what I’ve found here in terms of adaptations to the pelvis from quadruped to biped, these can act as our ‘ground rules’ for consideration when designing anthro characters or mechanical walkers.

Points to consider:

• Centre of gravity – bipeds must make sure their centre of gravity doesn't shift drastically from side to side with each step, this is destablising and inefficient.
• A tall pelvis has the effect of lengthening the torso, meaning that the centre of gravity moves higher, further away from the hips. This makes the trunk harder to stabilise.
• The ‘S’ curve of the lumbar vertebra lowers the centre of gravity towards the hips, helping stabilise the torso.
• This lumbar curve also gives the vertebral column the flex needed to withstand the pressure of the torso acting through it, the lower lumbar have widened giving a larger surface area for weight transmission.
• A wider sacrum has evolved to accommodate the wider lower lumbar vertebra. The sacroiliac joint (connecting the sacrum and the pelvis) also has a large surface area for weight transmission from the torso through both sides of the pelvis down to the femoral heads.
• The widened sacrum increases the width of the 'true pelvis', (the space through the centre of the pelvis), facilitating the ability to birth offspring with much larger craniums.
• However, a wider pelvis is a problem. During the support phase of locomotion one leg is off the ground. The weight of the torso is now acting on the femoral head of the standing leg. This is an example of a first class lever (levers that balance weight like a child's see-saw). The femoral head is acting as the pivot and the distance from the pivot to the body weight is called the 'load arm'. The ‘force arm’ on the other side of the pivot is our gluteus medius (an abductor muscle). It contracts to counterbalance the load arm. The wider we make our pelvis the longer we make the load arm, putting more pressure on the femoral head. We need a larger force or longer force arm to increase the mechanical advantage of this lever, otherwise we risk damaging the femoral head or having the hips slump with each step, just like the chimpanzee. In the Lucy skeleton, Australopithecus afarensis, it reveals her long load arm was countered by an increased length in the neck of the femur and a flaring of the iliac crest of the pelvis to place the abductors further from the pivot.
• The bicondylar angle is unique in humans. The femurs converge at the knees, bringing the legs close to the midline. This means the feet pass close to the midline and the centre of gravity is maintained directly underneath the torso. This is energy efficient as it doesn’t create a side to side motion of the hips when we walk.

Standing upright - Part II

It isn’t possible to directly compare a set of quadruped ‘buttocks’ to that of a human because for quadrupeds, like the horse in this example, their behinds are not really gluteals, they are hamstrings. I'll bang on about these muscles groups just once more:

Hamstrings: in quadrupeds serve as powerful hip extensors, driving the animal forwards against the ground reaction and pulling the leg up and backwards to take the next stride, whereas in humans their action is similar but less powerful due to them being almost vertical when stood upright. Importantly, in bipeds they counteract the truck from falling forward.

Gluteals: in a quadruped, are powerful locomotors also extending the hip, in humans these would relate to gluteus minimus and medius and are now adapted to stabilise the hip laterally, most notably when we stand with one leg off the ground, rather than being used for locomotion. In bipeds the gluteus maximus takes more of the role of hip extensor via the ilio-tibial band. Gluteus maximus also counteracts the truck from falling forward.

Take a look at the action of the race horses legs, you can see all that ground force coming from the contraction of the hamstrings at the back and gluteals at the top of the hind limb pulling them backwards and driving the horse forwards. 

The gluteus maximus dominates in humans, its function still makes it a powerful hip extensor but it’s role in stabilising, holding the femur and pelvis in alignment, keeps us stood upright. This makes it a very important muscle for bipeds. (Also worth noting that a large gluteal makes it easier for us to sit down).

Dependent on your furry character’s needs, be them straight legged or bent kneed, their gluteals and hamstrings are going to function slightly differently, be sized accordingly and maybe even positioned differently. All that is going to be aided by the configuration of their pelvis.

Standing upright - Part I

Bipedalism in Humans is by no means a well evolved task. We still have issues of lower back pain, knee joint stresses, ankle injuries and hip fractures. Many of these aliments are conditions of aging but it shows during our life time where we are taking the stresses and risks of standing upright.

When we discovered the skeletal remains of Australopithecus afarensis commonly known as ‘Lucy’, we had proof that bipedal hominids were around 3.5million years ago. When we look at her pelvis we can see more in common with our species than that of our distant relations like chimpanzees who are better adapted to climbing and quadruped walking. Lucy’s anatomy showed us that moving from quadruped to biped relied on a reconfiguration of the bony plains of the pelvis and the function of some locomotor muscles to provide lateral support while walking.

The ilia of most quadrupeds are thin and flat to the back of the torso, a gradual bending of these has formed the bony rounded ridge of the iliac crests, giving an anchor point for muscles bearing lateral support, very important for stabilising the hip of a biped.

This video is taken from the BBC’s ‘Prehistoric Autopsy’ Series. You can clearly see how similar Lucy walks compared to modern humans. In contrast the Chimpanzee on the right does not have the required skeletal and muscular configuration of its hip to allow it to walk effectively on two legs.

Pelvic configuration in humans has slowly adapted to provide quite a host of requirements: the most advantageous configuration of musculature for locomotion, transfer of weight during locomotion and to hold the torso upright during locomotion, along with providing the space to adequately hold the internal viscera, and importantly, the birthing passage for offspring. Because of the above, I feel that the pelvis is one of those areas that is quite pivotal in considering an anthro characters design. Without having to delve too deep into bio-mechanics  it’s good to take a look at some of the requirements needed to make a pelvis fit our characters given needs to see what ‘rules’ we may need to follow when making them more anthropomorphic. 

Elastic running

A good example of elastic strain energy while running in bipeds is from those who run with 'Blades'. Whilst Para-Olympic runners with below knee amputations have lost all of the explosive energy of their plantar flexors (calf muscles), what they now gain is the energy conservation of the ground forces from the design of the blades.

Oscar Pistorius, during the 2012 London Olympics complained that a co-competitor had an advantage over him because he had longer blades which gave him a longer stride.

Walking on 2 legs not 4 - Stride and energy

So what would make X-Men's Beast run faster than a human? Well there are a couple simple things that we can observe from those animals that can easily outrun us. Firstly, as a biped plantigrade our maximum stride length is really rather short, a longer stride covers more ground and generally makes a faster runner. (What could break that rule would be an elephant, a plantigrade, that moves it's legs very fast when it charges). 

Digitigrades like a cheetah and unguligrades such as horses have a stride advantage by having longer limbs distal from what would be the knee joint. Simply a lengthening of the metatarsals.

The length of the femurs represented above are equal in length across the different classes for comparison.

That's an advantageous change in bone configuration but driving the power is a muscular change. Secondly, animals like horses have short fibred muscles on their lower limbs that attach to long tendons for elastic energy storage. This increased spring creates a mechanical advantage in the limb, meaning the muscles become more economical as they do not need to generate as much force per stride.

Check out just how thin the lower leg is on a horse, those long tendons and the canon bone are really the only thing they've got; there's no muscle. Find more plates like this Here.

This video is taken from "Inside Nature's Giants - The Race Horse" - (Channel 4). It's a dramatic example of just how much force is stored in the tendons once they are under stress. Energy that would otherwise be lost is recovered via this elastic strain energy. This would make Beast's flat hand very energy inefficient whilst running, and even the bony arch of the human foot is rather inflexible and still a long way from holding the capacity of elastic strain of even a digitigrade.

So if you were designing a character that's a serious fast runner - biological or mech, you might want to give them a shorter thigh in relation to the lower leg to extend that stride and go easy on the musculature of the lower leg, giant muscles don't always create giant forces, that depends on their position on the limb in terms of leverage! Of course, these are not the only things to consider for a set of biped digitigrade legs...

Walking on 2 legs not 4 - Feet

This scene in X-Men First Class raised a brow when I first saw it. In it, Beast out runs Xavier.

What's been assumed here is that because Beast has hands for feet, he's better and faster at running than a human. Is that a correct assumption? Likely not, as it insinuates that the primate 'foot' is more adapted for running than a human foot.

The diagram above is pretty much representative of the anatomy that's at contest in the film. A chimpanzee's foot is a generalised appendage (gripping, climbing, walking, standing), the human foot has evolved into that of a specialised appendage for bipedal locomotion. We have a bony foot arch that allows for spring and the transmission of huge forces when we walk, making it more energy efficient. It is more adapted to forward propulsion and aids our gait, than that of a flat, figured hand of a chimp. Far from being faster, Beast would most likely injure himself trying to compete against human feet.  

Stature - Ribcage

The ribcage has only one major function and that's to act as a solid cavity in which the diaphragm can pull and push air into the lungs. Between human bipeds and any quadruped mammal the major difference in the ribcages are from the effects of gravity and the relative positioning of the forelimbs.

Both ribcages at the top are viewed from cranial to caudal, you could say a quadruped's deep and a human's wide. The bottom sketches show how the canine ribcage would compare as a biped.

It is unlikely that a canine ribcage could support the rise and fall, expansion and contraction needed if it were biped, it's adapted in the wrong plain. But I like the idea of adding some of these shapes to a biped ribcage. One starting point is the sternum, it builds that frontal plain of the chest - does it need to be vertical, could it be shorter? I number of differences between species exist but large differences are more likely to be due to the size of the organs the animal has.

I took a comparative view of a carnivore and herbivore. 

Take an equine, it's a prey species, its evolved to run, requires large volumes of oxygen to do so, it's ribcage is extensive to maximize its capacity. However, it's a herbivore, and needs a much larger gastro-intestinal (GI) tract for digestion. To aid this the sternum is comparatively shorter to the ribcage than in a canine this flares the ribcage, helping to fit those larger organs in. Our canine doesn't need a large GI tract or even needs to do a lot of running, it's ribcage accommodates for this.

I wanted to look and see how these species variations may shape our biped anthros.

A scribble of ideas, looking how to incorporate some form of shortened sternum or elongated ribcage as per the species.

 

For the moment I rested my focus on what creates the girth or volume of the chest, the relation of the 1st ribs, clavicles and sternum or what looks more like a 'collar and tie'. Drawing the 1st ribs from the spine to the sternum helps give the chest its volume. The length and angle of the sternum helps give our character a puffy chest or more space for a larger abdomen. 

Take a look at how flared they made the ribs on Tavros in the Narnia films. It's a high volume chest, certainly plenty of space for a herbivores GI tract.

Some ideas on larger herbivore types. That cervical curve is really going to dip if we make a character with those distinctive rounded shoulders with a neck in a 'stoop'. The nuchal ligaments are going to have to act like a crane arm to help stop that neck collapsing - it's rather unstable. So I've also highlighted some context as to large stabilising muscle shapes of the neck. I think this would really limit head rotation. Also the cervical vertebra in this configuration would have to be bulkier to take the stress of the lateral rotation.

Great video on cervical spine rotation.

Skull to Neck

As heads get bigger, so does the weight of keeping them upright. Here i'm showing the nuchal ligament as being an important part of keeping a larger head upright.

We need to strike a careful balance with how we expect larger anthro skulls to sit on a biped spine. The cervical vertebrae is the most flexible part of the spine but this comes at a trade-off with strength. Strong yet flexible interspinal ligaments hold the vertebrae from palling apart and in many quadrupeds the nuchal ligament is very important in holding the head and neck from collapsing under it's weight. In humans this tough ligament is less important, our skulls are balanced on the 1st cervical vertebrae, the Atlas, with stability aided by numerous muscles. An anthro skull by contrast would likely be heavier, larger facial features, big jaw. This upsets the balance and we can either reposition the skull on the atlas like a pivot or we recruit ligaments and muscles to help stability. Nuchal ligaments would act like a suspension bridge, pulling from the processes on the thoracic vertebrae to a prominent crest on the part of the Occipital bone of the skull.

What does this mean for character designs: 

consider the weight of your characters heads, this includes big horns and teeth! 

How would the cervical vertebrae curve, is it realistic

Where is the load of the head being distributed

Spinal processes are going to be visible along their backs

How will bigger back muscles such as the trapezius look and how is that head able to flex and move?!