Lumbar Support

I've gone back to thinking more about spinal curves when it comes to anthros. This is particularly relevant with tough, heavy types and also very relevant when thinking about how a tail would be structured and function on a biped. I think that the fundamental understanding of what can and can't be done with anthros bipeds certainly concerns the lumbar support system.

Part of the lumbar lordosis support

The human S-curve transfers tension and load down into the pelvis via the sacro-iliac joint. If we are going to retain anthro features such as larger skulls, bigger chest and shoulder like that of Minotaurs, the more weight we are applying to the cervical and thoracic vertebrae, ultimately pulling the torso forward as well as the centre of gravity. This is going to make it harder for this S-curve to hold it's mid-line (shown in red). If the mid-line shifts away from the sacro-iliac joint then weight transmission is less efficient, resulting in muscle groups having to bear the torso's load rather than the spine. 


In humans an important deep structure called the thoracolumbar fascia, which are tough multi-directional connective tissues directly attached to the spinous processes of the lumbar vertebrae. Our erector spinae muscles and latissimus dorsi, as well as our core muscles such as the obliques act to pull the thoracic spine (our chest) backwards and downwards, keeping us held upright. The gluteals as I've mentioned in previous posts are under tone to hold the pelvis from tilting forward, keeping us stood upright. These multiple actions ultimately draw the lumbar spine into lordosis like drawing the string on a bow, the lumbar curve is under a great deal of elastic energy, stored in the thoracolumbar fascia.


Understanding the limits of the lumbar curve is important for anthro characters, who are often portrayed as extra massive, with craning necks and heads. The spinal curves may have to adjust to hold this weight and maintain the mid-line, either through hyperlordosis or even kyphosis.

How the sacro-iliac joint and the lumbar curve would be arranged to structure a tail is a relevant question. It would certainly require changes to the configuration of the pelvis as well as considerations on nerve pathways out of the sacrum.

More on the thoracolumbar fascia:

Skull to Neck

As heads get bigger, so does the weight of keeping them upright. Here i'm showing the nuchal ligament as being an important part of keeping a larger head upright.

We need to strike a careful balance with how we expect larger anthro skulls to sit on a biped spine. The cervical vertebrae is the most flexible part of the spine but this comes at a trade-off with strength. Strong yet flexible interspinal ligaments hold the vertebrae from palling apart and in many quadrupeds the nuchal ligament is very important in holding the head and neck from collapsing under it's weight. In humans this tough ligament is less important, our skulls are balanced on the 1st cervical vertebrae, the Atlas, with stability aided by numerous muscles. An anthro skull by contrast would likely be heavier, larger facial features, big jaw. This upsets the balance and we can either reposition the skull on the atlas like a pivot or we recruit ligaments and muscles to help stability. Nuchal ligaments would act like a suspension bridge, pulling from the processes on the thoracic vertebrae to a prominent crest on the part of the Occipital bone of the skull.

What does this mean for character designs: 

consider the weight of your characters heads, this includes big horns and teeth! 

How would the cervical vertebrae curve, is it realistic

Where is the load of the head being distributed

Spinal processes are going to be visible along their backs

How will bigger back muscles such as the trapezius look and how is that head able to flex and move?!

S-spine, C-spine

Comparison of axial skeletons of a human and canine, arrows note the number and directions of each spinal curve. (Not to scale).

We encounter an extreme number of issues when converting quadruped anatomy to that of a biped. Essentially it boils down to the evolution of each systems handling of its centre of mass. Human bipeds balance their weight over 2 legs, with the centre of mass moving between each stance leg, however a quadruped dog shifts its weight between fore and hind limbs during movement.

The spines of each system are therefore adapted to cope with each of these extremes. The S-shape spine of a biped has 4 notable curves, creating it's distinctive S shape. This maintains the centre of gravity when standing from the top of the spine down through the feet. These curves also facilitate weight transference with minimal effort. 

The C-shape spine of quadrupeds have only 3 notable curves that are near opposite to biped curves. The C-shape comes from the thoracic and lumbar regions curving upwards. I've drawn the canine above stood upright, this would bring it's centre of gravity in front of its feet, causing it to be unbalanced and fall forward. The curvature of its spine, particularly at the lumbar region would not support the weight of an upright torso, the curve is in the wrong direction.

This shows that we simply can't start our anthropomorphic characters by just standing a quadruped up on 2 feet. This and other anatomical issues make this a poor starting point, however, should we wish to maintain a degree of our chosen animals features in our anthropomorphic bipeds we can start adapting this anatomy into likely possibles. Lets explore these possibilities...